Adjunct Pay and Benefits at the University of Hartford

and Surrounding Schools
(revised 5/31/2006)

 

Background:

  • Nationally, the use of part-time faculty has been growing steadily and is about 46%. Many details about this growth and some of the causes and consequences can be found at the following AAUP site: http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issuesed/contingent/
  • The University of Hartford has a similar pattern. A recent tally of adjunct teaching in the College of Arts and Sciences indicated about 47% of the courses were taught by adjuncts—with nearly 90% in RLC. Hillyer College is reported to have similar rates. The preliminary accreditation report gave an overall rate of about 48%. If you know the rates for your department or school, please contact Jay Stewart (x4331).
  • Thanks to pressure from the Faculty Senate’s Adjunct pay committee (Chair: Don Jones and, previously, Cynthia Ritvo) the University formed a committee to study the topic of adjunct pay at our school and surrounding schools that compete with us for adjuncts. Their report could not be released to the public because some of the schools released the pay rates under “confidentiality”. The executive summary of this report is located: http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/facsenate/ADJ_COMP_PLAN_JAN_06.HTM Subsequently, President Harrison supported the recommendations.

Actions & Results:

  • The pay rates seemed minimal compared to what we heard adjuncts saying they could earn at these other schools, so we decided to collect our own data. The report noted that we compete with five schools: UCONN, CCSU, Quinnipiac University (QU), and Manchester and Capital Communicty Colleges (CC). All of these schools have union-negotiated pay rates, even QU. The pay data are easily obtained on the web or by a phone call, as documented later. The only school unwilling to disclose adjunct pay data is the University of Hartford. The UHA rates shown below are those given in a few CAS departments until the 2005-6 year, which used an average of the CAS value and the new floor of $2600 for spring 2006. After that the UHA values are the new base pay rates and represent median pay rates (½ of adjuncts have less and ½ have more). We are quite certain that the UHA pay rates shown below are close approximations to the median adjunct pay for 3 credit courses over this time period AND must be correct for the 2005-2007 period, given the reported percents of adjuncts whose pay is improved in this period. Figure 1 provides a quick overview of our results. The different lines for the other schools are explained below.
  • A MS-Word version of the charts and data on this webpage is available here (with pay at St. Joseph College).

 

Figure 1. Nominal Pay for 3-Credit Course over Time for Selected Schools*

 

  • Pay Levels at the Competing Schools:
    UCONN: There are two levels. The upper level is at least 1% more than the lower level and used when a teacher has two, continuous years of teaching. These provide minimums from which the adjunct professor and the hiring chair negotiate. The negotiated pay is based upon degree, length of experience, discipline, etc.
    CCSU: There are six levels of pay based only on type of degree and teaching experience. These are fixed pay rates that do not vary by discipline or other factors. The lowest is for non-terminal degrees and less than 30 load credit hours of experience, i.e., less than 10 3-credit courses. This is the “CCSU_L” value in the above chart. Levels 2-3 are for increasing experience, but still non-terminal degrees. The 4-6th levels are for teachers with terminal degrees. The “CCSU_H” value in the above chart is for the 5th level, which is for a person with a terminal degree and having taught 10-20 3-credit courses. The 6th level (for those with greater than 20 3-credit courses) is almost $150 more than shown above, but seemed like an unreasonable comparison group, so was not presented in the chart or later tables. Emeritus professors teaching part-time and other “celebrity” scholars can be paid more, but not above $4617.
    CC: The Manchester and Capital Community Colleges have only two rates, which are based upon teaching experience. The CC_L rate is for those with less than 18 credit hours (or 6 3-credit courses). The CC_H is for those with 18 or more credit hours of experience. These are fixed rates that do not vary at all based upon other factors.
    QU: The 3 levels at QU depend upon degree and type of course (graduate or not) taught. These are fixed rates that do not depend upon subject or program. QU_L is for undergraduate instructors with non-terminal degrees. QU_T is for undergraduate professors with terminal degrees, which is what the majority of adjuncts are paid, so it would be the median pay of adjuncts at QU. QU_G is for adjuncts teaching graduate level courses.
  • All of the other schools have some formal recognition in pay differences based upon type of degree, years of experience, and/or level of course. UHA has no formal recognition of such differences.
  • How well do these proposed increases in salary keep up with the effects of inflation? In 2007 we will be paying our adjuncts less than we did in 2001. See the chart below, which controls for the cost of living (for Northeast urban areas) by expressing all of the salary data in $2006 (April) dollars (see values from the data table later). All the other schools, except UCONN, managed to keep ahead of inflation during the 2001-2006 period. Indeed, QU gave their adjuncts a 6.7% increase in pay from 2005-2006.

Figure 2. Real Pay (in 2006$) for 3-Credit Course over Time for Selected Schools*

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


*Data used in these charts are given later with their sources.
  • But the situation is even worse.
    BENEFITS offered at these other schools are significantly better than those offered here.

    UHA:

    • Allowed to participate in health insurance at group rate, but must pay full cost.
    • Part-time faculty can take one course, tuition free—space permitting—during the semester they are teaching here or the following semester.
    • Although part-timers with G3 contracts are given some benefits after one year, the benefits listed here for the other schools do not require additional contracts—only extended periods of employment.

     

    UCONN: (http://www.uconnaaup.org/resources/contract.html ) UCONN AAUP office: 860-487-0450.

    • Those teaching 8 credits or less:
      >>Retirement plan participation with 5% of salary from the faculty and 8% from the university.
      >> Allowed to participate in health insurance at group rate, but must pay full cost.
    • IF teaching 2 courses now and for last four semesters, $~900 in professional development funds.
    • Those teaching 9 credits or more get full benefits.

    CCSU:  ( http://www.ccsu.edu/aaup/part-time.htm )  CSU AAUP office: 860-832-3790

    • Retirement plan participation with 5% of salary from the faculty and 8% from the university.
    • $~600 in travel and development funds for attending conferences or professional workshops.
    • Free access to all recreational facilities on campus.
    • Waived tuition fees for the part-time faculty members teaching 18 or more credits over the last year. Only on a space available basis.
    • Allowed to participate in health insurance at group rate, but must pay full cost.

     

    Community Colleges (MCC & CCC): (http://www.the4cs.org/docUploads/PTGuide%206.2005.pdf ) The 4C’s union office is at 296-5172.

    • Those teaching half-time (17.5 hours/week) or more get full benefits.
    • Those teaching less:
      >> Retirement plan participation with 5% of salary from the faculty and 8% from the university.
      >> Allowed to participate in health insurance at group rate, but must pay full cost.
      >> Travel and development funds for attending conferences or professional workshops.
      >> Some sick leave days after their third semester.
      >> Job security after 24 credits: guaranteed offer of a course in their discipline, if one is available.

      

    Quinnipiac: (Quinnipiac University Part-Time Faculty Handbook 2005-2006 (pages 25-26) and Oct. 21, 2005 letter from Sarah Steele, Associate Vice President for Faculty Relations to Part-Time Faculty.

    • Free participation in the Fitness and Recreational facilities.
    • IF teaching 6 or more credits now and over each of the last four semesters:
      >> the university will pay 40% of the amount given full-time faculty for health insurance.
      >> retirement plan participation with 5% of salary from the faculty and 5% from the university.
      >> After 5 years of continuous service, the university will contribute 10% of salary to retirement with no required contributions from the part-time faculty member.
    • Laptop computer loans for part-time faculty who need them for more effective teaching.
    • Reduced tuition fees for the part-time faculty or family members on a pro-rata basis for part-time faculty members teaching 3 or more credits now and over each of the last four semesters. Only on a space available basis.

     

So What?

 There are many reasons to be concerned about this issue.

  • The University of Hartford prides itself on the quality of its teaching, which provides a major basis for recruiting students. It seems likely that we will have trouble recruiting and keeping the best adjunct teachers when they can get much better pay and benefits from our neighboring colleges. Thus, our teaching quality will suffer with possible long-term effects on student enrollments.
  • It is simply unjust to pay these dedicated and educated teachers so poorly without a formal recognition of their differences in degrees and teaching experiences and to offer such limited benefits. A university of our stature should be setting a better example.


WHAT TO DO?

There is a letter circulating that asks President Harrison to make an additional increase starting in the Fall 2006 semester. It has gone through several revisions and the most recent one is here. If you want to join a growing number of faculty (over 70), please print it out with the signature spaces on the back of the letter, sign it (and circulate it among colleagues), then call Jay Stewart (x4331) so that all can be gathered together for a final submission, which will be presented to President Harrison early in the summer of 2006.

The above charts and the data, data sources, and benefits listed below are available in a MS-Word document.

 

DATA SOURCES

Except for the UHA data, all salary data are based upon union contracts and are publicly available from the sources cited below.

 

Acad.Year (fall)
COLA NE Urban_1 4/2006
UCONN Low_2
UCONN High_2
CCSU Low_3
CCSU High_3
CC Low_4
CC High_4
QU Non-Term. Deg._5
QU Term. Deg._5
QU Grad Course_5
UHA_6
2001
1.166
.
.
.
.
2847
3066
2298
2700
3294
2600
2002
1.144
3630
3666
2994
3393
2988
3219
2298
2700
3294
2600
2003
1.115
3738
3775
3144
3564
2988
3219
2463
3012
3528
2600
2004
1.077
3837
3883
3144
3564
3138
3381
2700
3210
3750
2600
2005
1.038
3939
3984
3301
3742
3294
3549
2835
3375
3900
2650
2006
1
4057
4098
3465
3927
3459
3726
3000
3600
4101
2850
2007
0.965
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3000


Sources and notes:

1. The cost of living adjustment (COLA) values are from the Department of Labor statistics using their cost of living tables for urban areas in the Northeast US as of 4/2006. They are available here.

2. The UCONN rates are available at: http://www.uconnaaup.org/resources/contract.html in Article 19- Section IV. There are two levels. The upper level is at least 1% more than the lower level and used when a teacher has two, continuous years of teaching. These two rates provide the floor on salary negotiations.

3. The CCSU rates are available at pages 81-82 in the text of :
http://w3.sysoff.ctstateu.edu/web/CSUweb_Administration.nsf/b7989b92524436ce852569d8004a4615/32585fffa21adc4c852569ee001ebb49/$FILE/2002-2006%20CSU-AAUP%20Contract%20(a).pdf
with 2006-2007 rates given at: http://www.ccsu.edu/aaup/csu/Contract%20Agreement.pdf
There are 6 levels. The lowest is for non-terminal degrees and less than 30 load credit hours of experience, i.e., 10 3 credit courses. This is the “Low” value in the above table. The 4-6th levels are for teachers with terminal degrees. The “High” values in the above table are for the 5th level, which is for a person with a terminal degree and having taught 10-20 3-credit courses. The 6th level is almost $150 more than shown above, but seemed like an unreasonable comparison group, so was not presented in the charts or this table.

4. Both MCC and CCC have a union contract with salaries given at:
http://www.the4cs.org/docUploads/Part%20Timers%20Rates.pdf
The two pay levels are fixed and based upon experience only. The “Low” pay is for “less than 18 credit hours” and the “High” pay is for “18 or more credit hours.” The rates for 2006-2007 are a 5% increase and recently ratified by union members. See: http://www.the4cs.org/docUploads/wage%20reopener.pdf

5. The Quinnipiac University rates for 2004-2005 are located on printed page 37 of:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/PreBuilt/pdf/Manuals/manual_policies_june2005.pdf
The other rates are from QU’s Vice President for Faculty Relations. There are three fixed pay rates at QU and are only based upon degree and course level. The QU “non-terminal degree” rates are for undergraduate courses taught by instructors without a terminal degree. The majority of adjuncts are paid at the terminal degree rate (including many that do not have the terminal degree, as that rate was rarely used in the past). The highest rate is for graduate level courses.

6. The older UHA rates are based upon a couple of “typical” CAS departments before this year, but I know some that were even lower. The rate for year “2005” is the average of the departments’ rates for last fall and the new base rate for this spring (2006). These are base rates, but they are also very close to the average pay as measured by the median (½ below and ½ above) because the committee report noted that 50% to 75% of the adjuncts would have their pay improved at these new base rates, so at least 50% were at or below these new rates to begin with). Do not be misled by reports of higher “average” pay (using the “mean” pay) because the mean is strongly influenced by the highest values, which are given for 4-credit courses, courses in selected colleges, or graduate level courses.

NOTE: Any questions about the data can be answered by John Stewart, x4331, jstewart@hartford.edu.