University of Hartford  

Photovoltaic Arrays

 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Subhash Chandra, Ph.D.

Institute Director

chandra@hartford.edu

 

Thomas Filburn, Ph.D., P.E.

Institute Assistant Director

filburn@hartford.edu

 

Clean Energy Institute

College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture

University of Hartford

Comparison Between Predicted and Measured Power of Solar Insolation for a series of Photovoltaic Arrays
Problem Statement:  There are a number of models for predicting solar insolation at specific locations. Variations of these models are used size solar photovoltaic arrays based on predictions of the electrical energy produced over the course of an average year. The problem is to compare predictions based on two of these models with measured values of solar insolation and predictions of electrical energy when compared to values recorded for a specific array.

Description:  

A set of four arrays, consisting of 12 sets of photovoltaic cells per array, for a total of 48 cells, covering 46.45 m2, are located in Tolland, Ct. Software provided with the inverters record electrical energy produced over time. The model proposed by Goswami[1], et al, and the Clear Sky Model[2] ,recommended by ASHRAE, are used to predict solar insolation and energy generated, for specific days during the month of August, 2005. Solar insolation measurements, using a light meter calibrated in Watts/m2. Values of percentage of sun, based on Typical Meteorological Years[3] data, complied by NREL, are used to calculate energy, for the same period of time, and compared with predicted values. The comparison shows the Goswami model over predicts both insolation and energy. The ASHRAE model, while indicating better agreement for solar insolation, tends to overpredict the energy produced. This difference is thought to be due to shadowing of portions of the arrays over the course of the day and atmospheric conditions; e.g., high humidity, haze, etc, as well as possible variations of cell efficiency with temperature over the course of a day and from day to day. Using these results, predictions for a typical year indicate approximately 23% more energy than recorded.


[1] Goswami, Y. D., Kreith, F., Kreider, J.F., Principles of Solar Engineering, 2nd Ed., Buchanan.

[2] McQuiston, F.C., Parker, J.D., Spittler, J.D., Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Analysis and Design, 5th Ed. J.Wiley

[3]NREL/SP-463-7668, DE95004064, User Manual for TMY2s.

University of Hartford Participants:

Barry O’Grady

Faculty Advisor: Barry Lubin 
Client:  Barry Lubin, PhD
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

Fig.1 PV Tracking Arrays in Operation

 

Fig. 2 Underside of Tracking arrays