Background
Participants
Recommended Amendments
Convention Rules
Proposed Amendments
New Federalist Papers

Teachers' Resources
Suggested Activities

Questions or 
comments:
constcon99@aol.com
 

To Amend or Not to Amend? Experts Disagree 


 
 

Thomas Jefferson thought that if would be a good idea for each generation to write its own Constitution. Revisions should be made about ever 20 years in order for the Constitution to keep pace with changes in society. 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 

In contrast, James Madison feared such change would be too disruptive. He held that government should assume the people's consent until the people act to alter the Constitution. 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 

Patrick Henry argued that Article V made it far too difficult to amend the Constitution. He thought requiring three-quarters of the states to ratify an amendment was undemocratic, allowing a clear majority to be thwarted by a "contemptible minority." 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 

Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story argued that we should view the Amendment process as a kind of safety valve, a mechanism to let off the pressurized steam that builds within the system in order to keep the great machine of government chugging along.