Background
Participants
Recommended Amendments
Convention Rules
Proposed Amendments
New Federalist Papers

Teachers' Resources
Suggested Activities

Questions or 
comments:
constcon99@aol.com
 
 

Overturning Supreme Court Decisions with Constitutional Amendments

The Supreme Court's power of judicial review allows the court the power of interpreting the Constitution and determining whether any act of the Congress, the executive, or the state governments is in violation of the Constitution. Four of the twenty-seven amendments to the Constitution have overturned  Supreme Court decisions. Two other proposed but unratified amendments also sought to overturn decisions of the Supreme Court. 

The Eleventh Amendment
During the Revolution, wartime government of Georgia, the Executive Council, purchased supplies from a South Carolina businessman. Georgia received the supplies, but did not pay for them. After the businessman's death, the executor of his estate, Alexander Chisholm sued the state of Georgia for payment in Federal Court. Georgia maintained that the federal courts had no jurisdiction, but the Supreme Court, to the surprise of many, ruled in 1793 that federal courts could hear cases in which an citizen of  one state sues the government of another. In response to the decision, Congress proposed an amendment that would overrule the decision of Chisholm v. Georgia. The amendment was ratified in 1795. For more information, read William F. Swindler's, "Mr. Chisholm and the Eleventh Amendment," from the 1981 Yearbook of the Supreme Court Historical Society. 

The Fourteenth Amendment
In the infamous case of Dred Scott v. Sandford of 1857, the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that the slave Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom since slaves were not citizens of the United States. After the civil war, Congress and the states added the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which confers citizenship on all persons born or naturalized in the United States. 

The Sixteenth Amendment
In 1895, in the case of Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., the Supreme Court ruled that taxes on the income of individual citizens were a violation of Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, which states that direct taxes must be laid on the states in proportion to population. Congress proposed the Sixteenth Amendment in 1909 and it was ratified by the states in 1913, giving the power to Congress to levy a direct national income tax. 

The Twenty-sixth Amendment
In 1970, Congress passed a revision of the Voting Rights Act which allowed eighteen-year-olds to vote in federal, state, and local elections. The Supreme Court held, however, that Congress did not have the power to declare a voting age in state and local elections. The Twenty-sixth Amendment, which overruled this decision, quickly passed, in large part because eighteen-year-olds were currently losing their lives in Vietnam. 

Other Amendment Proposals
The Child Labor Amendment proposed in 1924 was an attempt to overturn the decision of Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) which stated that Congress did not have the power to regulate or prohibit the interstate shipment of goods produced by child labor. The Equal Rights Amendment proposed in 1972 was also, at least in part, a response to adverse Supreme Court decisions. In Goesaert v. Cleary (1948) the Court upheld a Michigan law making it illegal for women to work as bartenders; in Hoyt v. Florida (1961) the Court found Florida's practice of excluding women from jury duty Constitutional; in Williams v. McNair (1971) the Court allowed South Carolina to maintain single-sex state colleges. 

More recently, Congress has considered, but not proposed amendments to overturn other Court decisions. A School Prayer Amendment would overturn the decision of Engel v. Vitale (1962), which prohibits public schools prompting school children to engage in prayer. A Right to Life Amendment would overturn the decision of Roe v. Wade (1973), which allows women a right to abort their pregnancies. A Flag Desecration Amendment would overturn the decision ofTexas v. Johnson (1989), which found that the mutilation of the American flag is free speech protected by the First Amendment.